Posted in Uncategorized
Fault In Bicycle Accidents
When a cyclist is injured in a crash, one of the first legal questions that needs to be addressed is who was at fault. Determining fault is a key part of any personal injury claim, especially in situations involving cars and bicycles. It often affects the ability to recover compensation and how much is awarded. While each case has its own details, fault is usually established through a careful review of evidence and application of traffic laws.
Reviewing Traffic Laws And Right Of Way
In most bicycle accidents, the foundation for determining fault begins with the rules of the road. Cyclists and drivers are both required to follow traffic laws. If either party fails to follow those rules—such as running a red light, failing to yield, or not using proper signals—that conduct can contribute to fault.
When the police respond to a crash, they typically document these kinds of violations in the accident report. That report can play a significant role in assigning blame. In some cases, additional evidence is needed to support or challenge the information in that report, especially when there are disputes over who had the right of way or whether one party acted recklessly.
Gathering Evidence From The Scene
Photos, videos, witness accounts, and even data from GPS devices or traffic cameras can all be helpful in proving what happened. The position of the vehicles or bicycle after the accident, skid marks on the pavement, and nearby street signs or traffic signals can all tell part of the story.
Witnesses can often confirm or dispute the accounts of those involved. A nearby pedestrian or driver may have seen the cyclist entering the intersection or observed a vehicle speeding or swerving just before the crash. These details add context and help clarify the sequence of events.
Shared Responsibility And Comparative Fault
In many bicycle accident cases, fault is not assigned entirely to one party. Some states use what’s called comparative fault, which allows fault to be divided between the cyclist and the driver. For example, if a cyclist was hit by a speeding car but was also riding against traffic, both parties could be assigned a percentage of responsibility.
When this happens, the injured party may still recover damages, but the amount may be reduced based on their level of fault. This system is meant to reflect real-world situations where more than one action contributed to the accident.
The Importance Of Legal Guidance
Fault disputes can quickly become complicated, especially when insurance companies are involved. They often look for any opportunity to shift blame and reduce payouts. That’s why many injured cyclists seek legal help early in the process.
Attorneys like those at Aaron Feuer Law can attest to the importance of a thorough investigation when it comes to fault. Our friends at the firm often work with accident reconstruction specialists and investigators to build strong claims that reflect what actually happened—not just what’s in the initial report.
Closing Thoughts On Protecting Your Claim
Proving fault after a bicycle accident can make or break a claim. Evidence must be gathered, reviewed, and presented clearly to support a fair outcome. If you’re dealing with injuries from a crash and need guidance, it may be time to speak with a bicycle accident lawyer who can help protect your rights and pursue the compensation you deserve.
